Research · originally published
Antique Attributions Murky Part II
I think an equally important problem with making attributions is that we, on the whole, have long forgotten many fine makers from the Victorian era, probably numbering in the thousands - America alone, let alone globally. With an absence of labels, tags or stamps, we have nothing to remember them by except for old, buried newspaper articles of their factories closing or burning down.
There is no better example than this parlor set retailed and likely made by J. Ziegler & Co that was recently shared in the forum. "ThePeacockRoom" dug up a quote from Zeigler that "The firm offered "a large stock of plain and artistically rich furniture, all of their own manufacture...". So, according to them, they did not resell the work of other cabinetmakers.
The set has a surviving label on the underside confirming it is from J. Zeigler's "Furniture and Decorations Warehouse" in New York.
If you would have been tempted to put a Herter Brothers tag on it, there is a reason that it wouldn't have been too far-fetched to do so. If you haven't already read the whole forum thread, and to read about the connection between Herter Brothers and Zeigler, read the rest in the forum.
Also, see lot 110 in the upcoming Neal Auction sale this weekend for a comparable chair.
Leave a comment
Related archive entries
"Based On The Quality of Work" And Other False Reasonings
There are a lot of methodologies that people use to identify a particular piece's maker, but few of them drive me more bonkers than "based on the quality of the work it surely was made by so and so". Relative to what? Ho
George Hunzinger Receipt
I recently purchased this original George Hunzinger receipt from 1900, which is two years after George Sr's death. Notice the "& Son" in the logo. I assume that this is an example of Hunzinger wholesaling to another


1 comment