<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Victorian Furniture Makers&#8217; Careers Span Periods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rarevictorian.com/2009/08/victorian-furniture-makers-careers-span-periods.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rarevictorian.com/2009/08/victorian-furniture-makers-careers-span-periods.html</link>
	<description>The definitive Victorian antique furniture destination</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 22:07:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: English Classics</title>
		<link>http://rarevictorian.com/2009/08/victorian-furniture-makers-careers-span-periods.html/comment-page-1#comment-2398</link>
		<dc:creator>English Classics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rarevictorian.com/?p=3001#comment-2398</guid>
		<description>Today, I think hand-cut dovetails are preferable but perhaps 19th century techno-fetishism allowed for machine varieties.

Does anyone know what those small bits at the bottom of the dresser&#039;s feet are? They look like casters but I&#039;ve never seen casters on bun feet before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, I think hand-cut dovetails are preferable but perhaps 19th century techno-fetishism allowed for machine varieties.</p>
<p>Does anyone know what those small bits at the bottom of the dresser&#8217;s feet are? They look like casters but I&#8217;ve never seen casters on bun feet before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkecmonkedo</title>
		<link>http://rarevictorian.com/2009/08/victorian-furniture-makers-careers-span-periods.html/comment-page-1#comment-2395</link>
		<dc:creator>monkecmonkedo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 22:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rarevictorian.com/?p=3001#comment-2395</guid>
		<description>Typo above - I meant to say: &quot; ...a hand-cut dovetail joint was always considered &quot;higher end&quot;.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typo above &#8211; I meant to say: &#8221; &#8230;a hand-cut dovetail joint was always considered &#8220;higher end&#8221;.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkecmonkedo</title>
		<link>http://rarevictorian.com/2009/08/victorian-furniture-makers-careers-span-periods.html/comment-page-1#comment-2394</link>
		<dc:creator>monkecmonkedo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 22:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rarevictorian.com/?p=3001#comment-2394</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always thought some people made wild attributions - perhaps they were right all along!  I say this is jest...

Great comment about earlier pieces being most likely to have been produced by their own hands.  I agree completely but wanted to add that later pieces are more likely to be crafted in the makers vision.   To me, that is where the value lies.  Take Hunzinger as an example.  He produced fairly mundane chairs and rocking chairs early in his career.  His later works are what best embody his creativity and inventiveness.  I&#039;m sure he never gave so much as an approving nod to the chairs and rockers I have, but they are still his.  Unless I&#039;m wrong and George hand stamped each one lovingly as it left the factory.  :)

PS - I find it very interesting that Pottier and Stymus would use a Knapp joint on that dresser.  I thought a machine made joint was always considered &quot;higher end&quot;. Or am I wrong and it was perceived as technologically more advanced, thus acceptable for P&amp;S?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always thought some people made wild attributions &#8211; perhaps they were right all along!  I say this is jest&#8230;</p>
<p>Great comment about earlier pieces being most likely to have been produced by their own hands.  I agree completely but wanted to add that later pieces are more likely to be crafted in the makers vision.   To me, that is where the value lies.  Take Hunzinger as an example.  He produced fairly mundane chairs and rocking chairs early in his career.  His later works are what best embody his creativity and inventiveness.  I&#8217;m sure he never gave so much as an approving nod to the chairs and rockers I have, but they are still his.  Unless I&#8217;m wrong and George hand stamped each one lovingly as it left the factory.  <img src='http://rarevictorian.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>PS &#8211; I find it very interesting that Pottier and Stymus would use a Knapp joint on that dresser.  I thought a machine made joint was always considered &#8220;higher end&#8221;. Or am I wrong and it was perceived as technologically more advanced, thus acceptable for P&amp;S?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Werry</title>
		<link>http://rarevictorian.com/2009/08/victorian-furniture-makers-careers-span-periods.html/comment-page-1#comment-2392</link>
		<dc:creator>John Werry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rarevictorian.com/?p=3001#comment-2392</guid>
		<description>Zeke, and Meeks also did Late Classical.  Mitchell &amp; Rammelsberg also did Gothic Revival as did P&amp;S....

Would be a nice chart to produce with the periods across the x axis and makers across the y axis...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zeke, and Meeks also did Late Classical.  Mitchell &#038; Rammelsberg also did Gothic Revival as did P&#038;S&#8230;.</p>
<p>Would be a nice chart to produce with the periods across the x axis and makers across the y axis&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeke</title>
		<link>http://rarevictorian.com/2009/08/victorian-furniture-makers-careers-span-periods.html/comment-page-1#comment-2390</link>
		<dc:creator>zeke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 00:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rarevictorian.com/?p=3001#comment-2390</guid>
		<description>Great post John,

we should also mention Meeks which made Empire and Gothic furniture and went on to produce Rococo. I think most people think of Meeks as rococo and Belters main competitor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post John,</p>
<p>we should also mention Meeks which made Empire and Gothic furniture and went on to produce Rococo. I think most people think of Meeks as rococo and Belters main competitor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  rarevictorian.com/2009/08/victorian-furniture-makers-careers-span-periods.html/feed ) in 0.85387 seconds, on May 23rd, 2012 at 7:39 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 23rd, 2012 at 8:39 pm UTC -->
