http://rarevictorian.com/2008/07/hunzinger-and-merklen-reproductions.html The definitive Victorian antique furniture destination Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:41:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= http://rarevictorian.com/2008/07/hunzinger-and-merklen-reproductions.html/comment-page-1#comment-658 james conrad Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:58:12 +0000 http://rarevictorian.com/?p=670#comment-658 Yeah, "in the manner of" is a description i have not come across. Most of the houses i follow use the term "Style" to identify a non period piece, "chippendale style" as opposed to chippendale. Yeah, “in the manner of” is a description i have not come across. Most of the houses i follow use the term “Style” to identify a non period piece, “chippendale style” as opposed to chippendale.

]]> http://rarevictorian.com/2008/07/hunzinger-and-merklen-reproductions.html/comment-page-1#comment-648 RareVictorian Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:00:26 +0000 http://rarevictorian.com/?p=670#comment-648 I agree. Nothing wrong with reproductions as long as they're stated as such. I'm a bit lukewarm on how <a href="http://www.liveauctioneers.com/item/3900170" rel="nofollow">this one</a> got sold as "in the manner of" which to me is an antique industry phrase implying period - not new. I agree. Nothing wrong with reproductions as long as they’re stated as such. I’m a bit lukewarm on how this one got sold as “in the manner of” which to me is an antique industry phrase implying period – not new.

]]> http://rarevictorian.com/2008/07/hunzinger-and-merklen-reproductions.html/comment-page-1#comment-647 james conrad Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:45:13 +0000 http://rarevictorian.com/?p=670#comment-647 Hmmm, well, they are being marketed as reproductions so i dont see anything wrong with this. Hmmm, well, they are being marketed as reproductions so i dont see anything wrong with this.

]]>